Pages: [1]

Author Topic: i686 vs sse2 windows executables  (Read 1886 times)

daniel.santos

  • Guest
i686 vs sse2 windows executables
« on: 4 December 2008, 23:17:18 »
Quote from: "@kukac@"
I have Windows, but only the i686 works for me
I'm guessing that's because your processor doesn't support the SSE2 instruction set.

[You don't have to guess it, I can tell you, it's true ;)  - @kukac@]
Logged

modman

  • Guest
Re: i686 vs sse2 windows executables
« Reply #1 on: 7 December 2008, 14:38:17 »
Could someone please explain the difference between the two?  My computer runs both of them fine it seems.
Logged

Platyhelminth

  • Guest
Re: i686 vs sse2 windows executables
« Reply #2 on: 8 December 2008, 16:38:30 »
Daniel already explained, it is just because your processor supports SSE2 instruction set.

Their is absolutly no additionnal features between both. I suppose you should run the SSE2 binary because it is more optimized for your hardware ?
Logged

daniel.santos

  • Guest
Re: i686 vs sse2 windows executables
« Reply #3 on: 10 December 2008, 02:17:40 »
Yea, maybe I should put that in the README.txt?  Maybe I should *add* a README.txt? :)
Logged
Pages: [1]
 

anything