Poll

Who here is debating the best?

ElimiNator
0 (0%)
Sir Modman
2 (25%)
Gabriel, Gabbe
0 (0%)
John.d.h
0 (0%)
-Archmage-
5 (62.5%)
Zoythrus
0 (0%)
@kukac@
0 (0%)
wyvern
1 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 2

Voting closed: 15 January 2017, 12:44:02

Author Topic: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution  (Read 12913 times)

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #75 on: 6 May 2010, 20:34:10 »
ok i`ll have one video...

John.d.h

  • Moderator
  • Airship
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,757
  • I have to go now. My planet needs me.
    • View Profile
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #76 on: 6 May 2010, 20:37:17 »
Couldn't you just link to videos instead of embedding them? ::)

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #77 on: 6 May 2010, 20:42:26 »
but then noone will get interested, when they see the video on the glest page they will get interested and then i can spread the message.
You should watch it :)

ElimiNator

  • Airship
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,391
  • The MegaGlest Moder.
    • View Profile
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #78 on: 6 May 2010, 20:46:46 »
Can you remove that vid from you profile... Its huge.  :(
Get the Vbros': Packs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5!

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #79 on: 6 May 2010, 20:58:24 »
But you don`t have to click on it...

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #80 on: 6 May 2010, 20:59:09 »
okay, titi removed...

NVM back on topic

TheThinkingAtheist.com

wyvern

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #81 on: 6 May 2010, 22:05:58 »
Great site Gabbe :thumbup: :thumbup:, can I re vote?

modman

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #82 on: 6 May 2010, 23:36:58 »
Quote
Matter has to exist always because without anything available it is impossible to create anything. You can't build a car without the necessary parts can you, same with a creator, if he exists which I doubt Roll Eyes Roll Eyes he can't create things out of nothing but he could create new things out of the material available and even change the material, but the material has to be there and it must be available, humans can also alter materials, slightly.

And........the matter came from where?

The same place your "Creator" came from.  The difference?  We know matter exists, yet your hypothetical object is yet to be proven.  If you feel there is a proof, you must lay it out in your subsequent post.

Gabbe, I checked out those sites, there seems to be no science there.  Creationism sites are in fact very reliable, much more organised too.

Name one reason you think you are an authority on what is and is not science, considering your vacuum of knowledge of evolution is rather embarrassing.  You also misspelled "organized".

You must prove that matter just exists, that is a very stupid claim.

Maybe you should expand your vocabulary.  Everything is "stupid" to you.  Everyone you don't agree with is an "idiot".  Sheesh, if you made an attempt at descriptiveness, those things would be obvious, and you wouldn't need to insult anyone by saying those things either.

I am American, but I recognize that freedom of speech is a privilege and I always try to use it wisely.  Make the best out of opportunities to express the entirety of your opinion, and if it includes name-calling or other forms of bigotry.

My belief isn't exactly set, but I do think that a Creator, may have created the Big Bang, he may have put the stuff there to start the Big Bang.  But you cannot just claim that matter and all the laws of physics are just there.

Right now, science does not have a theory on the origin of the laws of physics and the origin of matter, only hypotheses.  But it would be dishonest to claim that a god must be responsible based on this fact.  The "God of the Gaps" argument is historically very inaccurate.

Quote
Matter can change but not instantly materialize

You're assuming that God is as limited as a Human.

And you're assuming there is a god.  Such metaphysical claims cannot be verified and thus have no place in a scientific debate.

-Archmage-

  • Moderator
  • Dragon
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,887
  • Make it so.
    • View Profile
    • My Website
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #83 on: 7 May 2010, 00:56:55 »
Quote
If you feel there is a proof, you must lay it out in your subsequent post.

1-The extreme fine-tuning of the universe. The laws of the universe are perfect, and completely reliable.
2-The extremely well designed Human body.



Quote
Name one reason you think you are an authority on what is and is not science

I never said I was an authority.
I just know what science is when I see it, and I cruised around on that website for 15 minutes only running into a video of a guy talking about his show, and a bunch of links.
I also looked at a FAQ, that I found on the second website, all that was in the FAQ was all the wrong frequently asked questions.



Quote
considering your vacuum of knowledge of evolution is rather embarrassing.

I know what evolution is.



Quote
You also misspelled "organized".

Oops. :P Common mistake of mine.



Quote
And you're assuming there is a god.  Such metaphysical claims cannot be verified and thus have no place in a scientific debate.

From all the evidence, yes, I'm "assuming", or rather 'knowing' that a Creator exists.
Egypt Remastered!

Proof: Owner of glest@mail.com

modman

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #84 on: 7 May 2010, 01:29:19 »
Quote
If you feel there is a proof, you must lay it out in your subsequent post.

1-The extreme fine-tuning of the universe. The laws of the universe are perfect, and completely reliable.

Well I think if the laws of the universe were perfect we would see a lot more --infinitely more-- life in our neck of the universe than we do.  We don't know what the universe would be like with different properties, because the universe is, well, complex.  It took millions of years for the first stars to form, I believe.

2-The extremely well designed Human body.

Eight percent of pregnancies end in clinical miscarriage.  It seems God is the most prevalent abortionist of all!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscarriage#Prevalence

Quote
Name one reason you think you are an authority on what is and is not science

I never said I was an authority.  I just know what science is when I see it, and I cruised around on that website for 15 minutes only running into a video of a guy talking about his show, and a bunch of links.  I also looked at a FAQ, that I found on the second website, all that was in the FAQ was all the wrong frequently asked questions.

My bad.  I checked those websites and their content is not really centered on science, but philosophy (atheism).  I wouldn't be surprised to find information about evolution there, but it isn't the best resource for it.

Quote
considering your vacuum of knowledge of evolution is rather embarrassing.

I know what evolution is.

Yea, and I know what quantum entanglement is, but I don't understand it.  And for this reason I would never participate in a debate over whether it occurs or not.  You claim evolution is random, but in reality it is like a poker game: sure, your hand might be random, but the better player will almost always win.

Quote
And you're assuming there is a god.  Such metaphysical claims cannot be verified and thus have no place in a scientific debate.

From all the evidence, yes, I'm "assuming", or rather 'knowing' that a Creator exists.

Wonderful.  Let's continue discussion of the existence of God in another topic.

The first law of thermodynamics and the principle of the conservation of energy deem it impossible for God to have created matter, because it would have been an increase of matter and energy not accounted for by a decrease elsewhere.  Unless it can be proven that God is omnipotent, no one can use the cop out that "God transcends the laws of physics".

ElimiNator

  • Airship
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,391
  • The MegaGlest Moder.
    • View Profile
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #85 on: 7 May 2010, 03:07:53 »
Who gets to pick the rules of life?
Get the Vbros': Packs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5!

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #86 on: 7 May 2010, 05:35:43 »
*Who* is probably very ignorant and you are already set that there must be a creator, but a creator has yet to be prooven, so "who" is innacurate.

"What is the rules of life?" we can rather say

Time,Physics,Matter i think

-Archmage-

  • Moderator
  • Dragon
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,887
  • Make it so.
    • View Profile
    • My Website
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #87 on: 7 May 2010, 10:20:22 »
Quote
Quote from: -Archmage- on May 06, 2010, 22:01:43
Quote
If you feel there is a proof, you must lay it out in your subsequent post.

1-The extreme fine-tuning of the universe. The laws of the universe are perfect, and completely reliable.

Well I think if the laws of the universe were perfect we would see a lot more --infinitely more-- life in our neck of the universe than we do.  We don't know what the universe would be like with different properties, because the universe is, well, complex.  It took millions of years for the first stars to form, I believe.

The laws of the universe work though, they aren't unreasonable.



Quote
Quote from: -Archmage- on May 06, 2010, 22:01:43
2-The extremely well designed Human body.

Eight percent of pregnancies end in clinical miscarriage.  It seems God is the most prevalent abortionist of all!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscarriage#Prevalence

Part of the adventure of life, a sense of good and bad wouldn't be very good without the bad to contrast with the good. Good and Bad practically define each other.
Note: I'm not saying that I enjoy the bad stuff, but it's what makes the good stuff good.



Quote
Quote from: -Archmage- on May 06, 2010, 22:01:43
Quote
considering your vacuum of knowledge of evolution is rather embarrassing.

I know what evolution is.

Yea, and I know what quantum entanglement is, but I don't understand it.  And for this reason I would never participate in a debate over whether it occurs or not.  You claim evolution is random, but in reality it is like a poker game: sure, your hand might be random, but the better player will almost always win.

Yea, but I'm just kinda getting the idea you aren't aware of some serious problems that evolution faces.



Quote
Quote from: -Archmage- on May 06, 2010, 22:01:43
Quote
And you're assuming there is a god.  Such metaphysical claims cannot be verified and thus have no place in a scientific debate.

From all the evidence, yes, I'm "assuming", or rather 'knowing' that a Creator exists.

Wonderful.  Let's continue discussion of the existence of God in another topic.

The first law of thermodynamics and the principle of the conservation of energy deem it impossible for God to have created matter, because it would have been an increase of matter and energy not accounted for by a decrease elsewhere.  Unless it can be proven that God is omnipotent, no one can use the cop out that "God transcends the laws of physics".

Well you have to realize, proving that would prove to be pretty much impossible if God didn't want us too prove his existence. If he came down and said "Here I am. Believe now?", that would be nice, but he isn't like that much(Jesus). I have a feeling that we might have another Jesus sometime with the next 500 years. He came down the Roman Empire before it crumbled, he may come down to the USA before we crumble. The Roman Empire was the most powerful and impressive Empire in the world, their legions defeated everybody, but they got destroyed from the inside out. USA is definitely the most powerful country in the world, by far, though we are quite a bit nicer with our military than the Romans, we can defeat anybody worldwide. We're also sadly crumbling from the middle, the democrats in this country seem to be almost trying to destroy the country, spending money we don't have, pretty soon USA gonna have a big "Made in China" sticker.



Quote
Who gets to pick the rules of life?

God. But a lot of scientists are corrupted by the government, so  most of the stuff you hear about, like Global Warming for example, has been show to be complete non-sense, but I'm no expert on that, my Dad's the one who knows about Global Warmings faults, I'm the evolution guy. :P
Egypt Remastered!

Proof: Owner of glest@mail.com

wyvern

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #88 on: 7 May 2010, 13:36:28 »
I know how to settle this a glest fight between Creationists and Evolutionists, just kidding.
Quote
1-The extreme fine-tuning of the universe. The laws of the universe are perfect, and completely reliable.
Not necessarily.

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #89 on: 7 May 2010, 16:26:46 »
Quote
God. But a lot of scientists are corrupted by the government, so  most of the stuff you hear about, like Global Warming for example, has been show to be complete non-sense, but I'm no expert on that, my Dad's the one who knows about Global Warmings faults, I'm the evolution guy. Tongue

There is something here that does need to be prooved...

Won`t answer anymore, modman express very well and he doesn`t seem to need backup very much, and your ignorant as hell, because you have no backup, nothing, actually, we will have to degrade your theory to a "hypothesis"


@kukac@

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #90 on: 7 May 2010, 17:42:24 »
Gabbe, it took you some time to realize, that it's not wise to talk to a deaf man ;D

Don't you overreact this whole thing a little? We are on a programming forum, and you made a theme about an off topic topic. Plus, don't you feel, that you are making fun from the religion? (If I remember well, that's against the rules, but I'm not sure - I can't find the rules btw... )

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #91 on: 7 May 2010, 17:56:30 »
Im not making fun of any religion.

Im spreading the word of mine.

BTW then arch has violated the rules several times.

-Archmage-

  • Moderator
  • Dragon
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,887
  • Make it so.
    • View Profile
    • My Website
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #92 on: 7 May 2010, 20:04:29 »
Gabbe, you have proved yourself irrational, and Kukac, your even worse.

Modman is worth debating with, he's intelligent and logical(not that I think his belief in evolution is logical...).
Egypt Remastered!

Proof: Owner of glest@mail.com

John.d.h

  • Moderator
  • Airship
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,757
  • I have to go now. My planet needs me.
    • View Profile
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #93 on: 7 May 2010, 20:45:57 »
Don't you overreact this whole thing a little? We are on a programming forum, and you made a theme about an off topic topic.
This is what I've been thinking for a while.  It's like this "non-topic" has taken over the Glest board.  Sure, it's on the off-topic section, but this is the Glest forum, not a religious debate forum.  There are plenty of those all over the internet.

modman

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #94 on: 8 May 2010, 17:14:32 »
Don't you overreact this whole thing a little? We are on a programming forum, and you made a theme about an off topic topic.
This is what I've been thinking for a while.  It's like this "non-topic" has taken over the Glest board.  Sure, it's on the off-topic section, but this is the Glest forum, not a religious debate forum.  There are plenty of those all over the internet.

It's not like I haven't suggested to those interested that they join Debating Christianity, a very good debate forum.  It's in my signature!  I want them to.  A gaming forum is just not the appropriate place for a serious debate, because it doesn't have the same vigor as a site whose moderators impose warnings for bad debating practices (yes, you can get in trouble for repeated dodging of a question).  There you will find a far higher concentration of people who are actually good at debating.

wyvern

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #95 on: 8 May 2010, 18:12:54 »
I've mentioned plenty of times that arguing on this topic is pointless ::) ::)

Gabbe

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #96 on: 8 May 2010, 19:33:20 »
Remove topics? I would want to.

modman

  • Guest
Re: Debate: Creationism vs Evolution
« Reply #97 on: 9 May 2010, 20:20:10 »
Do not remove this topic.  I will lock it.

//EDIT: There has been a request to unlock this topic.  I feel that the best website for evolution and religion debate is Debating Christianity.  I encourage all people interested in this kind of debate to participate there.
« Last Edit: 13 May 2010, 02:19:28 by Sir modman »