Author Topic: [fixed] r3625: AI multiplier shown for closed slots on headless server  (Read 701 times)

tomreyn

  • Local Moderator
  • Airship
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,764
    • View Profile
    • MegaGlest - the free and open source cross platform 3D real-time strategy game
When there are two players on a headless server, and the controlling player sets an 8 player map, then sets control of players 5 and 7 (slots 6 and 8) to CPU, then switches to a 4 player map, this results in this view on the non-controlling clients' screen (and there only, it's fine on the controlling client):



Multipliers for slots which are not available should not be displayed.
« Last Edit: 7 October 2012, 05:30:49 by softcoder »
atibox: Ryzen 1800X (8 cores @3.6GHz), 32 GB RAM, MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 8G, PCI subsystem ID [1462:3417], (Radeon RX 580 chipset, POLARIS10) @3440x1440; latest stable Ubuntu release, (open source) radeon (amdgpu) / mesa video driver
atibox (old): Core2Quad Q9400 (4 cores @2.66GHz), 8 GB RAM, XFX HD-467X-DDF2, PCI subsystem ID [1682:2931], (Radeon HD 4670, RV730 XT) @1680x1050; latest stable Ubuntu release, (open source) radeon / mesa video driver
notebook: HP envy13d020ng
internet access: VDSL2+

· · · How YOU can contribute to MG · Latest development snapshot · How to build yourself · Megapack techtree · Currently hosted MG games · · ·

titi

  • MegaGlest Team
  • Airship
  • ********
  • Posts: 4,240
    • View Profile
    • http://www.titusgames.de
Re: r3625: AI multiplier shown for closed slots on headless server
« Reply #1 on: 3 October 2012, 21:49:23 »
I think the problem has something to do with the fact that the missing map has only 4 slots, but the currently shown map has 8 slots.
Maybe tomreyn can try this ?
Try Megaglest! Improved Engine / New factions / New tilesets / New maps / New scenarios

softcoder

  • MegaGlest Team
  • Battle Machine
  • ********
  • Posts: 2,239
    • View Profile
Re: r3625: AI multiplier shown for closed slots on headless server
« Reply #2 on: 4 October 2012, 23:28:43 »
Should be fixed in svn

 

anything